BREAKING NEWS: As per Skysport, Newcastle United told they can now proceed to sign £100m player for just £38m


Newcastle United are once again being linked with a potential move for Manchester City winger Jack Grealish, as speculation surrounding the England international’s future continues to grow. Grealish has endured a frustrating season at the Etihad Stadium, struggling to secure consistent minutes under Pep Guardiola. As a result, several Premier League clubs — including Newcastle — are reportedly monitoring the situation closely.

While Newcastle United are said to admire Grealish’s abilities and pedigree, a number of significant factors could hinder any potential move. First and foremost, the financial implications of signing the former Aston Villa captain are substantial. Grealish is believed to be one of the highest earners at Manchester City, currently pocketing a reported £300,000 per week. For a club like Newcastle, even with increased spending power, taking on such wages could be a major challenge — especially when trying to maintain balance across the squad.

Moreover, Grealish is approaching his 30th birthday, which adds another layer of complexity to any prospective deal. Investing a large sum in a player nearing the latter stages of his prime, particularly one who hasn’t been a regular starter in recent seasons, might not align with Newcastle’s long-term strategy.

Newcastle’s Summer Budget and Grealish’s Price Tag

Reports suggest Newcastle could have as much as £150 million to invest in their squad this summer. However, those funds must be allocated wisely, with the club looking to strengthen multiple areas ahead of another competitive campaign. Grealish, despite his undeniable talent, would require a hefty chunk of that budget — not just in terms of transfer fee, but also due to his high salary demands.

According to The Chronicle, Manchester City would be open to selling Grealish this summer, with a valuation believed to be between £38 million and £43 million. That figure represents a significant drop from the £100 million City paid to sign him from Aston Villa in 2021, but it still marks a major investment. Even if Newcastle pursued a loan move instead of a permanent transfer, City would reportedly expect the Magpies to cover a considerable portion of Grealish’s wages — a figure that could still be prohibitive.

Competing Interest and Squad Considerations

Back in April, GIVEMESPORT reported that several Premier League clubs — including Tottenham Hotspur, Aston Villa, and Newcastle — were all being touted as possible destinations for Grealish if he were to move on from Manchester City. However, when taking into account the financial demands of such a deal, Newcastle may now appear to be the least likely of the three to secure his signature.

Adding further complexity to the situation is Newcastle’s current squad depth on the left wing. Eddie Howe already has Anthony Gordon and Harvey Barnes competing for minutes in that position, while Joelinton is also capable of filling in there when needed. Given this level of depth, splashing out on another high-profile left-sided attacker could be seen as excessive — especially when other areas of the squad may require more urgent reinforcement.

Mixed Reaction from Fans

Among the Newcastle fanbase, there appears to be a growing consensus that pursuing Grealish may not be the right move. While his technical quality and creativity are not in doubt, his inconsistency at Manchester City and ongoing injury struggles have raised concerns. The high cost of acquiring him — both in terms of transfer fee and wages — combined with the fact that Newcastle already have capable players in his position, makes the potential deal seem impractical to many supporters.

In the end, while Jack Grealish’s name may continue to be linked with a move to St. James’ Park, the financial and tactical realities suggest it would take a dramatic shift for Newcastle United to truly consider him a top priority this summer.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *