On Saturday, I found myself compelled to reflect deeply on Newcastle United’s recent match performance. My previous article on The Mag was fueled by a wave of anger and frustration, a natural reaction to the high standards set by Eddie Howe. However, after taking some time to gather my thoughts, I’d like to delve into what might be contributing to Newcastle’s struggles this season.
At the outset, it’s clear that we’ve seen some degree of improvement in intensity. Initially, the team would press effectively for only about 15 minutes against Southampton. Now, we’re managing a more sustained pressing effort, perhaps lasting around half an hour. This is a small yet significant step forward, especially when considering how much of a cohesive effort pressing requires—cooperation between forwards and midfielders is essential.
Eddie Howe has shown caution in integrating new players, and it’s understandable. Pressing is not just a solo endeavor; it demands a synchronized approach from the entire team. Unfortunately, we’re currently witnessing opposing teams bypass our pressing efforts with surprising ease. Last season’s injury woes may still be casting a shadow over our ability to play at a high intensity.
Consider teams like Manchester City and Brighton: once they score, they maintain possession with a level of control that seems to stifle any chance of reclaiming the ball. It’s a tough situation when we see our players, like Anthony Gordon, pressing energetically while others, like Isak, appear to lack that same urgency. When running with your head down, it often signifies either sheer determination or fatigue—neither of which is conducive to effective pressing.
Transitioning play is another area where we’ve seen fluctuations. Pep Guardiola praised Newcastle last season for our lethal transitions, moving from defense to attack in a matter of touches. Think back to memorable moments, like Bruno’s assist against Leicester or Isak’s electrifying runs against Liverpool. Those moments captured the essence of our ability to transition quickly and effectively.
However, this season, the dynamic seems to have shifted. We are now on the receiving end of teams that allow us the ball for the first 20 to 30 minutes, only to crowd the box and disrupt our play. Our once-dependable attacking sources, like Isak and Gordon, have been stifled, and we now find ourselves relying heavily on Barnes’ curling shots and Schar’s long-range efforts for goals.
Against Brighton, glimpses of last season’s prowess were evident with two golden chances falling to Isak and Gordon, both of which went begging. We excel when up against attacking teams, where our speedsters can exploit defensive weaknesses. Yet, the intricate wing play that once flourished, particularly along the right side with Longstaff, Trippier, and Almiron, has sadly diminished. If we continue down this path, the need for a creative midfielder or winger becomes increasingly pressing.
When faced with teams employing a high block, our pattern of play appears disjointed. Players like Tonali and Bruno often struggle to penetrate defenses, leading to frustrating sequences where the ball seems to circulate endlessly among our defenders without meaningful progress into the opposition half. The repetitive pattern—Pope to Schar, back to Burn, then cycling through the midfield—often culminates in a lack of decisive action, as we struggle to break down compact defenses.
Consider this scenario: Bruno and Joelinton engage in some tiki-taka in midfield, desperately trying to find a way through, only to realize their options are limited. Isak, closely marked, becomes a less viable target. Meanwhile, free players like Murphy remain unutilized. The predictability has crept into our play, and that’s something we cannot afford.
As I delve deeper into tactics, it’s evident that our formation—typically a 4-3-3—morphs throughout the match. Howe employs this formation for its versatility, but even in a structured system, players must adapt fluidly to the situation on the pitch. Trippier’s leadership shines in this role, while Bruno energizes the crowd. Yet, the variations between personnel can drastically alter our effectiveness.
Defensively, having Burn or Hall in specific positions influences our buildup play and ability to transition effectively. Opponents are certainly analyzing our tactics, and their strategic adjustments can neutralize our strengths, such as the quick link-up play and dangerous attacking patterns we once showcased.
Now we arrive at a crucial question: how can we reinvigorate our midfield? Some may argue for resting players rather than outright replacing them. The current state of the squad suggests that a shake-up could be beneficial. Why not test Longstaff, Willock, and Tonali in a fresh midfield trio? This could potentially breathe new life into the squad and improve overall performance.
At this juncture, with the challenging fixtures ahead against Chelsea and Arsenal, what do we have to lose? Unleashing fresh energy from our squad players could inspire a competitive edge, allowing the team to play unpredictably against tired opponents in the latter stages of matches.
While I may not be an expert, I’m deeply invested in discussing our beloved Newcastle United. The conversation surrounding our team’s dynamics is vital, and I welcome all opinions. After all, it’s our passion for the club that fuels these discussions, and together, we can hope for a brighter path forward.