Exclusive: £149m bill looming as Daniel Levy warns against excessive Tottenham payout
Daniel Levy’s Tottenham Era: Financial Mastery Amid Footballing Frustrations
Since Daniel Levy first assumed the role of Tottenham Hotspur chairman in 2000—initially on an interim basis—English football has undergone a seismic transformation. From tactics and technology to finances and fan engagement, the game today bears little resemblance to the one Levy stepped into at the turn of the millennium.
Now the longest-serving executive in the Premier League, the 63-year-old former investment banker has not only overseen Spurs’ evolution—he’s played a central role in redefining the club’s identity. Under his stewardship, Tottenham have transformed from a traditional English football club into a modern-day commercial powerhouse and a globally recognised entertainment brand. In fact, it’s not unreasonable to argue that Levy is one of the architects of this new footballing paradigm.
The Business of Spurs: Growth Without Personal Investment
Tottenham’s financial performance over the past two decades stands as a testament to Levy’s relentless focus on business growth and sustainability. The club’s revenue has soared, particularly following the move from White Hart Lane to the state-of-the-art Tottenham Hotspur Stadium. Revenue is expected to surpass £650 million during the 2025–26 season—nearly double the figure generated in the club’s final year at their former home.
But here’s the kicker: unlike some of their rivals, Spurs have achieved this without significant injections of personal capital from ownership. Levy and ENIC (the club’s controlling stakeholders) have rarely dipped into their own pockets. Instead, they’ve built a self-sustaining financial model through careful brand building, commercial expansion, and international engagement.
A key figure in that global journey has been South Korean superstar Son Heung-min. Now poised to leave Spurs for LAFC after a decade of loyal service, Son’s influence stretches far beyond the pitch. His celebrity status in East Asia helped elevate Tottenham’s global profile and commercial appeal in markets that were previously out of reach.
The Elephant in the Room: Footballing Success
Yet for all the off-pitch success, the on-pitch picture has often been underwhelming. Aside from last season’s fairytale UEFA Europa League triumph, Spurs have frequently fallen short of expectations when it comes to silverware. Despite respectable league finishes and appearances in domestic and European finals, the club’s trophy cabinet remains sparse.
This disconnect—between the club’s financial power and its footballing output—is one of the main criticisms levelled at Levy. His notoriously tough negotiating style has cost Spurs several marquee signings over the years. Critics argue that his frugality, while beneficial to the balance sheet, has sometimes come at the expense of sporting progress.
Despite those frustrations, the numbers tell their own story. In both gross and net terms, Spurs have spent more in recent years than many would expect, challenging the perception that Levy is unwilling to back his managers in the transfer market.
Currently, the club is exploring external investment opportunities to further boost their transfer capabilities. With rising competition from clubs like Newcastle United, Aston Villa, and Brighton—alongside the traditional “Big Six”—Tottenham know they need to spend smarter and harder to keep pace.
Enter Thomas Frank: A New Era?
The arrival of Thomas Frank, who will manage his first competitive match in the UEFA Super Cup clash against Paris Saint-Germain next week, signals a new era. Whether the former Brentford boss can transform Spurs from perennial also-rans into consistent winners remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: he inherits a club that’s among the best-run in the world—off the field.
So how do you grade Levy’s tenure? In terms of footballing success, many fans would assign a harsh D−. But when it comes to business acumen and long-term financial planning, few could argue against awarding him an A*.
A New Threat: Government Regulation
One of the most contentious issues facing Tottenham—and English football more broadly—is the impending introduction of an independent regulator. Born from the fallout of the attempted European Super League breakaway in 2021—a plan Levy was reportedly involved in—the regulator is expected to arrive by late 2025 or early 2026.
Its remit will include overseeing financial practices across the top five tiers of English football, assessing the suitability of new club owners, and ensuring greater protections for fans. In essence, it aims to correct some of the systemic issues that have plagued clubs in recent years—from reckless ownership to financial mismanagement.
Levy, however, is no fan of the idea. Speaking to Gary Neville on The Overlap, he expressed concern over unnecessary government interference.
> “We’re going through a period of change,” he said. “We’re now going to have some government regulation, which personally I’m not in favour of, but it’s coming, so we have to accept it and embrace it.”
He pointed out that many of the proposed responsibilities for the regulator are already addressed through existing Premier League mechanisms such as owners’ and directors’ tests and fan charters.
The Financial Burden of Regulation
Another bone of contention is the cost. According to new estimates by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, the regulator could cost between £103 million and £149 million over its first decade of operation. That bill will initially be covered by the taxpayer, but eventually passed onto the clubs themselves.
Additional compliance costs—covering staffing, reporting, and system upgrades—could set clubs back a further £29 million to £46 million over the same period. And those costs won’t be evenly shared. Clubs like Spurs, with broader financial shoulders, will be expected to contribute significantly more.
Levy, never one to miss a financial detail, voiced scepticism about those figures:
> “Let’s come back here in 10 years’ time and see if that’s really the cost. It will be very interesting.”
Still, despite Levy’s apprehension, there’s widespread support for the regulator across fan groups, journalists, and football finance experts—including many in Tottenham’s own supporter base. The recent financial collapses of clubs like Bury, Macclesfield, and Morecambe have strengthened public appetite for accountability.
Sovereign Wealth and Football’s Future
One final topic that arose during Levy’s interview was the increasing influence of state-owned investment in football. Once a vocal critic of sovereign wealth in sport, Levy has recently softened his stance—at least in principle.
While he remains adamant that related-party transactions (i.e., clubs doing business with state-owned sponsors to inflate revenue) must be strictly controlled, he said he has “no issue” with state ownership itself.
> “I think that is an area that needs to be controlled,” he told Neville. “Otherwise, you have clubs that are owned by states… [who] can do deals with themselves which gives them a competitive advantage.”
This was likely a thinly veiled reference to Manchester City and Newcastle United, whose owners have pumped millions into their clubs through sponsorship deals. Ironically, Spurs have also been linked with Qatari investment, including Qatar Sports Investments (QSI), whose president Nasser Al-Khelaifi has met Levy on several occasions.
The pair will likely cross paths again when Spurs and PSG face off in the Super Cup. Whether that meeting leads to further investment talks remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the influence of Gulf state money in football is here to stay—and Tottenham may soon have a seat at that table.
—
Conclusion
Daniel Levy’s legacy is already one of the most complex in Premier League history. As a businessman, he has transformed Tottenham Hotspur into a model of modern financial efficiency. But football, as fans will always remind us, is not played on spreadsheets. With the arrival of a new manager, increased pressure to deliver silverware, and the looming presence of an independent regulator, the next chapter in the Levy era could be his most defining yet.